mirror of
https://github.com/simonw/datasette.git
synced 2025-12-10 16:51:24 +01:00
Additional tests for restrict SQL
Refs https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2572#issuecomment-3482778412
This commit is contained in:
parent
161f2937cb
commit
c0a87b809f
3 changed files with 329 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -375,7 +375,11 @@ async def _build_single_action_sql(
|
|||
|
||||
# Add restriction list CTE if there are restrictions
|
||||
if restriction_sqls:
|
||||
restriction_intersect = "\nINTERSECT\n".join(restriction_sqls)
|
||||
# Wrap each restriction_sql in a subquery to avoid operator precedence issues
|
||||
# with UNION ALL inside the restriction SQL statements
|
||||
restriction_intersect = "\nINTERSECT\n".join(
|
||||
f"SELECT * FROM ({sql})" for sql in restriction_sqls
|
||||
)
|
||||
query_parts.extend(
|
||||
[",", "restriction_list AS (", f" {restriction_intersect}", ")"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
|
@ -506,7 +510,10 @@ async def check_permission_for_resource(
|
|||
if restriction_sqls:
|
||||
# Check if resource is in restriction allowlist
|
||||
# Database-level restrictions (parent, NULL) should match all children (parent, *)
|
||||
restriction_check = "\nINTERSECT\n".join(restriction_sqls)
|
||||
# Wrap each restriction_sql in a subquery to avoid operator precedence issues
|
||||
restriction_check = "\nINTERSECT\n".join(
|
||||
f"SELECT * FROM ({sql})" for sql in restriction_sqls
|
||||
)
|
||||
restriction_query = f"""
|
||||
WITH restriction_list AS (
|
||||
{restriction_check}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -293,7 +293,11 @@ async def resolve_permissions_from_catalog(
|
|||
|
||||
# Build restriction list with INTERSECT (all must match)
|
||||
# Then filter to resources that match hierarchically
|
||||
restriction_intersect = "\nINTERSECT\n".join(restriction_sqls)
|
||||
# Wrap each restriction_sql in a subquery to avoid operator precedence issues
|
||||
# with UNION ALL inside the restriction SQL statements
|
||||
restriction_intersect = "\nINTERSECT\n".join(
|
||||
f"SELECT * FROM ({sql})" for sql in restriction_sqls
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Combine: resources allowed by permissions AND in restriction allowlist
|
||||
# Database-level restrictions (parent, NULL) should match all children (parent, *)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
315
tests/test_restriction_sql.py
Normal file
315
tests/test_restriction_sql.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
|
|||
import pytest
|
||||
from datasette.app import Datasette
|
||||
from datasette.permissions import PermissionSQL
|
||||
from datasette.resources import TableResource
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_multiple_restriction_sources_intersect():
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test that when multiple plugins return restriction_sql, they are INTERSECTed.
|
||||
|
||||
This tests the case where both actor _r restrictions AND a plugin
|
||||
provide restriction_sql - both must pass for access to be granted.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
from datasette import hookimpl
|
||||
from datasette.plugins import pm
|
||||
|
||||
class RestrictivePlugin:
|
||||
__name__ = "RestrictivePlugin"
|
||||
|
||||
@hookimpl
|
||||
def permission_resources_sql(self, datasette, actor, action):
|
||||
# Plugin adds additional restriction: only db1_multi_intersect allowed
|
||||
if action == "view-table":
|
||||
return PermissionSQL(
|
||||
restriction_sql="SELECT 'db1_multi_intersect' AS parent, NULL AS child",
|
||||
params={},
|
||||
)
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
plugin = RestrictivePlugin()
|
||||
pm.register(plugin, name="restrictive_plugin")
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
ds = Datasette()
|
||||
await ds.invoke_startup()
|
||||
db1 = ds.add_memory_database("db1_multi_intersect")
|
||||
db2 = ds.add_memory_database("db2_multi_intersect")
|
||||
await db1.execute_write("CREATE TABLE t1 (id INTEGER)")
|
||||
await db2.execute_write("CREATE TABLE t1 (id INTEGER)")
|
||||
await ds._refresh_schemas() # Populate catalog tables
|
||||
|
||||
# Actor has restrictions allowing both databases
|
||||
# But plugin only allows db1_multi_intersect
|
||||
# INTERSECT means only db1_multi_intersect/t1 should pass
|
||||
actor = {
|
||||
"id": "user",
|
||||
"_r": {"d": {"db1_multi_intersect": ["vt"], "db2_multi_intersect": ["vt"]}},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
page = await ds.allowed_resources("view-table", actor)
|
||||
resources = {(r.parent, r.child) for r in page.resources}
|
||||
|
||||
# Should only see db1_multi_intersect/t1 (intersection of actor restrictions and plugin restrictions)
|
||||
assert ("db1_multi_intersect", "t1") in resources
|
||||
assert ("db2_multi_intersect", "t1") not in resources
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
pm.unregister(name="restrictive_plugin")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_restriction_sql_with_overlapping_databases_and_tables():
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test actor with both database-level and table-level restrictions for same database.
|
||||
|
||||
When actor has:
|
||||
- Database-level: db1_overlapping allowed (all tables)
|
||||
- Table-level: db1_overlapping/t1 allowed
|
||||
|
||||
Both entries are UNION'd (OR'ed) within the actor's restrictions.
|
||||
Database-level restriction allows ALL tables, so table-level is redundant.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
ds = Datasette()
|
||||
await ds.invoke_startup()
|
||||
db = ds.add_memory_database("db1_overlapping")
|
||||
await db.execute_write("CREATE TABLE t1 (id INTEGER)")
|
||||
await db.execute_write("CREATE TABLE t2 (id INTEGER)")
|
||||
await ds._refresh_schemas()
|
||||
|
||||
# Actor has BOTH database-level (db1_overlapping all tables) AND table-level (db1_overlapping/t1 only)
|
||||
actor = {
|
||||
"id": "user",
|
||||
"_r": {
|
||||
"d": {
|
||||
"db1_overlapping": ["vt"]
|
||||
}, # Database-level: all tables in db1_overlapping
|
||||
"r": {
|
||||
"db1_overlapping": {"t1": ["vt"]}
|
||||
}, # Table-level: only t1 in db1_overlapping
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Within actor restrictions, entries are UNION'd (OR'ed):
|
||||
# - Database level allows: (db1_overlapping, NULL) → matches all tables via hierarchical matching
|
||||
# - Table level allows: (db1_overlapping, t1) → redundant, already covered by database level
|
||||
# Result: Both tables are allowed
|
||||
page = await ds.allowed_resources("view-table", actor)
|
||||
resources = {(r.parent, r.child) for r in page.resources}
|
||||
|
||||
assert ("db1_overlapping", "t1") in resources
|
||||
# Database-level restriction allows all tables, so t2 is also allowed
|
||||
assert ("db1_overlapping", "t2") in resources
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_restriction_sql_empty_allowlist_query():
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test the specific SQL query generated when action is not in allowlist.
|
||||
|
||||
actor_restrictions_sql() returns "SELECT NULL AS parent, NULL AS child WHERE 0"
|
||||
Verify this produces an empty result set.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
ds = Datasette()
|
||||
await ds.invoke_startup()
|
||||
db = ds.add_memory_database("db1_empty_allowlist")
|
||||
await db.execute_write("CREATE TABLE t1 (id INTEGER)")
|
||||
await ds._refresh_schemas()
|
||||
|
||||
# Actor has restrictions but action not in allowlist
|
||||
actor = {"id": "user", "_r": {"r": {"db1_empty_allowlist": {"t1": ["vt"]}}}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Try to view-database (only view-table is in allowlist)
|
||||
page = await ds.allowed_resources("view-database", actor)
|
||||
|
||||
# Should be empty
|
||||
assert len(page.resources) == 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_restriction_sql_with_pagination():
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test that restrictions work correctly with keyset pagination.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
ds = Datasette()
|
||||
await ds.invoke_startup()
|
||||
db = ds.add_memory_database("db1_pagination")
|
||||
|
||||
# Create many tables
|
||||
for i in range(10):
|
||||
await db.execute_write(f"CREATE TABLE t{i:02d} (id INTEGER)")
|
||||
await ds._refresh_schemas()
|
||||
|
||||
# Actor restricted to only odd-numbered tables
|
||||
restrictions = {"r": {"db1_pagination": {}}}
|
||||
for i in range(10):
|
||||
if i % 2 == 1: # Only odd tables
|
||||
restrictions["r"]["db1_pagination"][f"t{i:02d}"] = ["vt"]
|
||||
|
||||
actor = {"id": "user", "_r": restrictions}
|
||||
|
||||
# Get first page with small limit
|
||||
page1 = await ds.allowed_resources(
|
||||
"view-table", actor, parent="db1_pagination", limit=2
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert len(page1.resources) == 2
|
||||
assert page1.next is not None
|
||||
|
||||
# Get second page using next token
|
||||
page2 = await ds.allowed_resources(
|
||||
"view-table", actor, parent="db1_pagination", limit=2, next=page1.next
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert len(page2.resources) == 2
|
||||
|
||||
# Should have no overlap
|
||||
page1_ids = {r.child for r in page1.resources}
|
||||
page2_ids = {r.child for r in page2.resources}
|
||||
assert page1_ids.isdisjoint(page2_ids)
|
||||
|
||||
# All should be odd-numbered tables
|
||||
all_ids = page1_ids | page2_ids
|
||||
for table_id in all_ids:
|
||||
table_num = int(table_id[1:]) # Extract number from "t01", "t03", etc.
|
||||
assert table_num % 2 == 1, f"Table {table_id} should be odd-numbered"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_also_requires_with_restrictions():
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test that also_requires actions properly respect restrictions.
|
||||
|
||||
execute-sql requires view-database. With restrictions, both must pass.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
ds = Datasette()
|
||||
await ds.invoke_startup()
|
||||
db1 = ds.add_memory_database("db1_also_requires")
|
||||
db2 = ds.add_memory_database("db2_also_requires")
|
||||
await ds._refresh_schemas()
|
||||
|
||||
# Actor restricted to only db1_also_requires for view-database
|
||||
# execute-sql requires view-database, so should only work on db1_also_requires
|
||||
actor = {
|
||||
"id": "user",
|
||||
"_r": {
|
||||
"d": {
|
||||
"db1_also_requires": ["vd", "es"],
|
||||
"db2_also_requires": [
|
||||
"es"
|
||||
], # They have execute-sql but not view-database
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# db1_also_requires should allow execute-sql
|
||||
result = await ds.allowed(
|
||||
action="execute-sql",
|
||||
resource=TableResource("db1_also_requires", None),
|
||||
actor=actor,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True
|
||||
|
||||
# db2_also_requires should not (they have execute-sql but not view-database)
|
||||
result = await ds.allowed(
|
||||
action="execute-sql",
|
||||
resource=TableResource("db2_also_requires", None),
|
||||
actor=actor,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_restriction_abbreviations_and_full_names():
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test that both abbreviations and full action names work in restrictions.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
ds = Datasette()
|
||||
await ds.invoke_startup()
|
||||
db = ds.add_memory_database("db1_abbrev")
|
||||
await db.execute_write("CREATE TABLE t1 (id INTEGER)")
|
||||
await ds._refresh_schemas()
|
||||
|
||||
# Test with abbreviation
|
||||
actor_abbr = {"id": "user", "_r": {"r": {"db1_abbrev": {"t1": ["vt"]}}}}
|
||||
result = await ds.allowed(
|
||||
action="view-table",
|
||||
resource=TableResource("db1_abbrev", "t1"),
|
||||
actor=actor_abbr,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True
|
||||
|
||||
# Test with full name
|
||||
actor_full = {"id": "user", "_r": {"r": {"db1_abbrev": {"t1": ["view-table"]}}}}
|
||||
result = await ds.allowed(
|
||||
action="view-table",
|
||||
resource=TableResource("db1_abbrev", "t1"),
|
||||
actor=actor_full,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True
|
||||
|
||||
# Test with mixed
|
||||
actor_mixed = {"id": "user", "_r": {"d": {"db1_abbrev": ["view-database", "vt"]}}}
|
||||
result = await ds.allowed(
|
||||
action="view-table",
|
||||
resource=TableResource("db1_abbrev", "t1"),
|
||||
actor=actor_mixed,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_permission_resources_sql_multiple_restriction_sources_intersect():
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test that when multiple plugins return restriction_sql, they are INTERSECTed.
|
||||
|
||||
This tests the case where both actor _r restrictions AND a plugin
|
||||
provide restriction_sql - both must pass for access to be granted.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
from datasette import hookimpl
|
||||
from datasette.plugins import pm
|
||||
|
||||
class RestrictivePlugin:
|
||||
__name__ = "RestrictivePlugin"
|
||||
|
||||
@hookimpl
|
||||
def permission_resources_sql(self, datasette, actor, action):
|
||||
# Plugin adds additional restriction: only db1_multi_restrictions allowed
|
||||
if action == "view-table":
|
||||
return PermissionSQL(
|
||||
restriction_sql="SELECT 'db1_multi_restrictions' AS parent, NULL AS child",
|
||||
params={},
|
||||
)
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
plugin = RestrictivePlugin()
|
||||
pm.register(plugin, name="restrictive_plugin")
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
ds = Datasette()
|
||||
await ds.invoke_startup()
|
||||
db1 = ds.add_memory_database("db1_multi_restrictions")
|
||||
db2 = ds.add_memory_database("db2_multi_restrictions")
|
||||
await db1.execute_write("CREATE TABLE t1 (id INTEGER)")
|
||||
await db2.execute_write("CREATE TABLE t1 (id INTEGER)")
|
||||
await ds._refresh_schemas() # Populate catalog tables
|
||||
|
||||
# Actor has restrictions allowing both databases
|
||||
# But plugin only allows db1
|
||||
# INTERSECT means only db1/t1 should pass
|
||||
actor = {
|
||||
"id": "user",
|
||||
"_r": {
|
||||
"d": {
|
||||
"db1_multi_restrictions": ["vt"],
|
||||
"db2_multi_restrictions": ["vt"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
page = await ds.allowed_resources("view-table", actor)
|
||||
resources = {(r.parent, r.child) for r in page.resources}
|
||||
|
||||
# Should only see db1/t1 (intersection of actor restrictions and plugin restrictions)
|
||||
assert ("db1_multi_restrictions", "t1") in resources
|
||||
assert ("db2_multi_restrictions", "t1") not in resources
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
pm.unregister(name="restrictive_plugin")
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue