> The snippets in these articles all use `mod_rewrite`, which [should be considered a last resort](https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/rewrite/avoid.html). A good alternative that's less resource-intensive is `mod_setenvif`; see [httpd docs](https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/rewrite/access.html#blocking-of-robots) for an example. You should also consider [setting this up in `httpd.conf` instead of `.htaccess`](https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/howto/htaccess.html#when) if it's available to you.
They're extractive, confer no benefit to the creators of data they're ingesting and also have wide-ranging negative externalities.
**[How Tech Giants Cut Corners to Harvest Data for A.I.](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/06/technology/tech-giants-harvest-data-artificial-intelligence.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ik0.Ofja.L21c1wyW-0xj&ugrp=m)**
> OpenAI, Google and Meta ignored corporate policies, altered their own rules and discussed skirting copyright law as they sought online information to train their newest artificial intelligence systems.
**[How AI copyright lawsuits could make the whole industry go extinct](https://www.theverge.com/24062159/ai-copyright-fair-use-lawsuits-new-york-times-openai-chatgpt-decoder-podcast)**
> The New York Times' lawsuit against OpenAI is part of a broader, industry-shaking copyright challenge that could define the future of AI.
## How can I contribute?
Open a pull request. It will be reviewed and acted upon appropriately. **We really appreciate contributions** — this is a community effort.
