mirror of
https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware.git
synced 2026-11-05 18:08:25 +01:00
Change definitions heading and add back vibecoded tag (#813)
Co-authored-by: JesseBot <jessebot@linux.com> Co-authored-by: cloudymax <cloudymax@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/813 Reviewed-by: Max <cloudymax@noreply.codeberg.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
10b983b764
commit
20fb5e3ebd
4 changed files with 99 additions and 39 deletions
10
FAQ.md
10
FAQ.md
|
|
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ There's no great place to put these in our current files, but these sorts of que
|
|||
|
||||
## Can we split the "Permissive AI Policy" tag further?
|
||||
|
||||
> No, beyond "vibecoded" being added in some extreme cases. We don't want to have this conversation continually, as it is subjective what "severity" something falls under. The decision to add these tags took us a long time, and unless you have another *specific* tag that cannot be covered under any other tag, we're currently not open to discussion about this. This repo is already quite a lot to manage.
|
||||
> No, we don't want to have this conversation continually, as it is subjective what "severity" something falls under. The decision to add these tags took us a long time, and unless you have another *specific* tag that cannot be covered under any other tag, we're currently not open to discussion about this. This repo is already quite a lot to manage. We need to keep tags specific.
|
||||
|
||||
## What if the AI code is human reviewed?
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -56,11 +56,11 @@ There's no great place to put these in our current files, but these sorts of que
|
|||
|
||||
## Why is removal harder than landing on the list in the first place?
|
||||
|
||||
> Because the project betrayed our trust. Now they have to try harder to rebuild that by committing to doing better in an accountable, public, concreate, and enforceable way. If the project is committed to doing better by rejecting AI in the future, putting out a No AI policy or updating their contributing docs, shouldn't be that difficult.
|
||||
> Because the project betrayed our trust. Now they have to try harder to rebuild that by committing to doing better in an accountable, public, concrete, and enforceable way. If the project is committed to doing better by rejecting AI in the future, putting out a No AI policy or updating their contributing docs, shouldn't be that difficult.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why can't I include an social media post?
|
||||
## Why can't I include a social media post?
|
||||
|
||||
> We do not want to have a social media type atmosphere here and quoting social media posts, no matter what side people are on, gets messy. The mtaintiners here do not have the mental health to engage in social media drama that inevitably arises from AI bros, nor do we want to inflict that on anyone who is unaware of this list and hasn't consented to that attention. This does not mean you should reach out to your favorite anti-AI influencer for permission to include them in this list. We don't want you to do that.
|
||||
> We do not want to have a social media type atmosphere here and quoting social media posts, no matter what side people are on, gets messy. The maintainers here do not have the mental health to engage in social media drama that inevitably arises from AI bros, nor do we want to inflict that on anyone who is unaware of this list and hasn't consented to that attention. This does not mean you should reach out to your favorite anti-AI influencer for permission to include them in this list. We don't want you to do that.
|
||||
|
||||
### But what if it's a social media post against AI?
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -68,4 +68,4 @@ There's no great place to put these in our current files, but these sorts of que
|
|||
|
||||
## I don't like your definition of slop or vibecoded. Can you change it?
|
||||
|
||||
> No. Those [definitions](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware#definitions) stay and are not up for debate.
|
||||
> No. Those [definitions](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware#definitions) stay and are not up for debate.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue