remote/open-slopware
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware.git synced 2026-10-28 22:27:04 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

rename repo's old org references and add most basic of PR templates (#945)

Browse source 
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/pulls/945
This commit is contained in:
admin 2026-06-10 19:46:22 +02:00 • committed by Admin
commit 3db1bfa2eb
11 changed files with 93 additions and 74 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

22
FAQ.md
View file

@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ There's no great place to put these in our current files, but these sorts of que
## Can I self-advertise my project (that doesn't use AI)?
> Yes, provided it's FOSS, has a code of conduct (even if it's a solo project), and a No AI Policy, you can add your project as an alternative to any tainted software in which it is a good fit, and you can also open a [Call for Collaborators Issue](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/issues/new?template=.forgejo%2fissue_template%2fcollaborate-with-me.yaml).
> Yes, provided it's FOSS, has a code of conduct (even if it's a solo project), and a No AI Policy, you can add your project as an alternative to any tainted software in which it is a good fit, and you can also open a [Call for Collaborators Issue](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/issues/new?template=.forgejo%2fissue_template%2fcollaborate-with-me.yaml).
## I use AI in my project and do not plan on stopping. Should I self-submit?
> You don't have to, but it's helpful, because you know best what the alternatives are, and when your last untainted commit was, which is helpful for those who wish to fork your project. We hope you'll consider dropping AI one day, for all the reasons we've listed in our [Why Not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section, but if you don't plan on doing that ever, please just be cordial in this repo. No one is here to attack you, and if they do, please tag @vleermuis-admin and we'll handle the situation.
> You don't have to, but it's helpful, because you know best what the alternatives are, and when your last untainted commit was, which is helpful for those who wish to fork your project. We hope you'll consider dropping AI one day, for all the reasons we've listed in our [Why Not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section, but if you don't plan on doing that ever, please just be cordial in this repo. No one is here to attack you, and if they do, please tag @vleermuis-admin and we'll handle the situation.
## Do closed source or proprietary products belong on this list?
@ -20,23 +20,23 @@ There's no great place to put these in our current files, but these sorts of que
## What if the AI code is human reviewed?
> Slop that is human reviewed is still slop. We are against AI for more than just code quality reasons. Please see our [Why Not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section.
> Slop that is human reviewed is still slop. We are against AI for more than just code quality reasons. Please see our [Why Not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section.
## Why are you targeting/attacking/harassing my favorite project?
> We do not "target", "harass", or "attack" any projects. We, in fact, have a [very strict policy on not doing that](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/src/branch/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md#be-kind-or-be-gone). This repo is one based on ethics and is intended as a call to action. If a project meets the definition of one of our tags, it will see itself added to this repo. It can take steps to stop doing whatever it is in that definition and we'll remove it. (See also the [guide for removal](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#removal-of-tainted-status).)
> We do not "target", "harass", or "attack" any projects. We, in fact, have a [very strict policy on not doing that](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/src/branch/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md#be-kind-or-be-gone). This repo is one based on ethics and is intended as a call to action. If a project meets the definition of one of our tags, it will see itself added to this repo. It can take steps to stop doing whatever it is in that definition and we'll remove it. (See also the [guide for removal](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#removal-of-tainted-status).)
## If a repo had slop before, isn't it permanently tainted? Aren't all forks of slop therefore also slop?
> No. See also: [guide for removal](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#removal-of-tainted-status).
> No. See also: [guide for removal](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#removal-of-tainted-status).
>
> Eventually, the slop will likely either be removed, replaced, or deprecated.
>
> We're also against AI for more than just code quality reasons. There's plenty of ethical reasons to be against continuing to use AI:
>
> - [environmental](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware#environmental-impact)
> - [ties to the war industrial complex](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware#ties-to-the-war-industrial-complex)
> - [effect on hardware prices hurting newcomers to the industry](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware#effect-on-hardware-prices) (especially those already disenfranchised)
> - [environmental](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#environmental-impact)
> - [ties to the war industrial complex](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#ties-to-the-war-industrial-complex)
> - [effect on hardware prices hurting newcomers to the industry](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#effect-on-hardware-prices) (especially those already disenfranchised)
>
> The commitment to stop using AI stops those above ethical issues. It's like going vegetarian. You're still a vegetarian if you previously consumed meat, but now you don't. You've still reduced suffering and helped the environment. A commitment to doing better is better than never stopping a harmful action.
@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ There's no great place to put these in our current files, but these sorts of que
## Can you advise us on the ethical usage of AI?
> No, but you may find the work of [DAIR](https://dair-institute.org/) interesting. Also, see our [Why not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section.
> No, but you may find the work of [DAIR](https://dair-institute.org/) interesting. Also, see our [Why not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section.
## What about "Open Source AI"?
> Yes, simply being open source does not resolve the issues listed in our [Why Not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section and thus such projects will still be included on this list.
> Yes, simply being open source does not resolve the issues listed in our [Why Not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section and thus such projects will still be included on this list.
## Why is removal harder than landing on the list in the first place?
@ -68,4 +68,4 @@ There's no great place to put these in our current files, but these sorts of que
## I don't like your definition of slop or vibecoded. Can you change it?
> No. Those [definitions](https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware#definitions) stay and are not up for debate.
> No. Those [definitions](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#definitions) stay and are not up for debate.