remote/open-slopware
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware.git synced 2026-11-09 11:58:25 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

move the 'why not llms' section to its own file (#979)

Browse source 
### Description of Changes

As per the suggestion in https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/issues/936#issuecomment-17477528 this puts the "why not llms" section in it's own file. It still maintains the section, so that previous links to it will still ultimately redirect users to the right place.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/pulls/979
This commit is contained in:
admin 2026-06-15 14:36:26 +02:00 • committed by Admin
commit 4d9a9dad96
4 changed files with 187 additions and 184 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
FAQ.md
View file

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ There's no great place to put these in our current files, but these sorts of que
## I use AI in my project and do not plan on stopping. Should I self-submit?
> You don't have to, but it's helpful, because you know best what the alternatives are, and when your last untainted commit was, which is helpful for those who wish to fork your project. We hope you'll consider dropping AI one day, for all the reasons we've listed in our [Why Not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section, but if you don't plan on doing that ever, please just be cordial in this repo. No one is here to attack you, and if they do, please tag @vleermuis-admin and we'll handle the situation.
> You don't have to, but it's helpful, because you know best what the alternatives are, and when your last untainted commit was, which is helpful for those who wish to fork your project. We hope you'll consider dropping AI one day, for all the reasons we've listed in our [Why Not LLMs?](./why_not_llms.md) section, but if you don't plan on doing that ever, please just be cordial in this repo. No one is here to attack you, and if they do, please tag @vleermuis-admin and we'll handle the situation.
## Do closed source or proprietary products belong on this list?
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ There's no great place to put these in our current files, but these sorts of que
## What if the AI code is human reviewed?
> Slop that is human reviewed is still slop. We are against AI for more than just code quality reasons. Please see our [Why Not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section.
> Slop that is human reviewed is still slop. We are against AI for more than just code quality reasons. Please see our [Why Not LLMs?](./why_not_llms.md) section.
## Why are you targeting/attacking/harassing my favorite project?
@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ There's no great place to put these in our current files, but these sorts of que
## Can you advise us on the ethical usage of AI?
> No, but you may find the work of [DAIR](https://dair-institute.org/) interesting. Also, see our [Why not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section.
> No, but you may find the work of [DAIR](https://dair-institute.org/) interesting. Also, see our [Why not LLMs?](./why_not_llms.md) section.
## What about "Open Source AI"?
> Yes, simply being open source does not resolve the issues listed in our [Why Not LLMs?](https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware#why-not-llms) section and thus such projects will still be included on this list.
> Yes, simply being open source does not resolve the issues listed in our [Why Not LLMs?](./why_not_llms.md) section and thus such projects will still be included on this list.
## Why is removal harder than landing on the list in the first place?