From aef15c1af3a040e0d3f25b454922efb481b8652b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: vleermuis-admin Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 22:08:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Change definitions heading and add back vibecoded tag --- README.md | 25 +++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index b1d27b6..7517fc9 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ Any other questions? Please check out our [FAQ](./FAQ.md), and if your question * [Effect on Hardware Prices](#effect-on-hardware-prices) * [License](#license) -## Definitions +# Definitions | Term | Definition | |-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Any other questions? Please check out our [FAQ](./FAQ.md), and if your question Below are special definitions that are used for tagging purposes. -### Permissive AI Policy +## Permissive AI Policy ![Permissive AI policy](./badges/permissive-ai-policy-orange.svg) @@ -209,7 +209,9 @@ Evidence can be: > [!Important] > If a core maintainer has noted that the code is entirely vibecoded, please put that as the *first* evidence link. -#### Vibecode +### Vibecode + +![Vibecoded](./badges/vibecoded.svg) Asking an AI to write software for you (often without human review). Per [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibe_coding): @@ -222,8 +224,7 @@ A **Vibecoder** is a person who uses AI prompts to generate anything, typically > [!Note] > Humans reviewing vibecoded code does not disqualify said code from being considered vibecoded. - -### AI Functionality +## AI Functionality ![AI Functionality](./badges/ai-functionality-yellow.svg) @@ -235,7 +236,7 @@ Evidence can be: - a blog post advertising the AI Functionality - a link to the default branch in a repo that shows where the AI Functionality is implemented -### AI Code Reviews +## AI Code Reviews ![AI Code Reviews](./badges/ai-code-reviews-purple.svg) @@ -247,7 +248,7 @@ Evidence can be: - an AI code review CI workflow. - a PR where an AI code review seems to be automatically created by some sort of third party app -### Gen AI 'Art' +## Gen AI 'Art' ![Gen AI 'Art'](./badges/gen-ai-art-dark-yellow.svg) @@ -257,7 +258,7 @@ Evidence can be: - link to the place where the AI "art" is used -### AI Sponsored +## AI Sponsored ![AI sponsored](./badges/ai-sponsored-blue.svg) @@ -269,7 +270,7 @@ Evidence can be: - link to website that lists AI companies in sponsors list - README that says "Sponsored by " -### AI Databroker Usage +## AI Databroker Usage ![AI Databroker Usage](./badges/ai-databroker-usage-pink.svg) @@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ Evidence can be: - Blog post talking about using AI for processing user data - Privacy policy listing an AI company as a third party service -### AI In Issue Tracker +## AI In Issue Tracker ![AI In Issue Tracker](./badges/ai-in-issue-tracker-teel.svg) @@ -290,7 +291,7 @@ Evidence can be: - Link to AI in an Issue, Bug report, Discussion, etc - must be related to the project's bug/issue tracking (e.g. dosu) -### Permits LLM Ingestion +## Permits LLM Ingestion ![Permits LLM Ingestion](./badges/permits-llm-ingestion.svg) @@ -306,7 +307,7 @@ Evidence can be: - An AI or Contribution policy that carves out a space for "using LLMs to understand the code" or "finding bugs" - Core maintainer using or accepting the use of AI for finding Security issues -### Request for Help +## Request for Help ![Request for Help](./badges/request-for-help.svg)