clear up licensing question around the "permits LLM ingestion" tag (#918)

Partially addresses #696

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/918
This commit is contained in:
vleermuis-admin 2026-06-09 11:45:56 +02:00 committed by Admin
commit ed44e9c55e

View file

@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ Evidence can be:
![Permits LLM Ingestion](./badges/permits-llm-ingestion.svg)
Permits the use of AI/LLMs to ingest the project's contents. This can be for "understanding the code better", "finding bugs/security issues/optimizations". This tag is to be used independently for projects that generally reject the use of AI in their code repositories, issue trackers, and sponsorships, but still encourage or permit users to use LLMs to ingest their code base.
Permits the use of AI/LLMs to ingest the project's contents. This can be for "understanding the code better", "finding bugs/security issues/optimizations". This tag is to be used independently for projects that generally reject the use of AI in their code repositories, issue trackers, and sponsorships, but still encourage or permit users to use LLMs to ingest their code base. This is independent of a project's licensing. This tag is to be used for the maintainers' statements about, or reactions to, the usage of LLMs/AIs to ingest the repo.
The reason we still find this worthy of a tag is because it:
@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ The reason we still find this worthy of a tag is because it:
Evidence can be:
- An AI or Contribution policy that carves out a space for "using LLMs to understand the code" or "finding bugs"
- Core maintainer using or accepting the use of AI for finding Security issues
- Core maintainer using or accepting the use of AI for finding bugs or security issues
> [!tip]
> This tag is not to be confused with ![Permissive AI policy](./badges/permissive-ai-policy-orange.svg), which is for when there is already AI generated code in the codebase or an `AGENTS.md` in the repo.