### Description of Changes
This PR fixes spelling throughout the CoC, Governance doc and Contributing doc.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/pulls/1029
Reviewed-by: Ethical FOSS admin <ethical-foss-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
### Description of Changes
Adds a new merit badge called "🌟 Anti-AI Policy" to distinguish alternatives that take a specific "No AI" stance.
- Closes#935
- Changes the badge colors around a bit
- "request for help" is now magenta
- "ai databroker" is now white
- Updates the README.md, STYLE.md, and CONTRIBUTING.md to reflect the change
- cleans up the CONTRIBUTING.md file to explain more about adding alternatives
- Applies new badge to all projects that had references to Anti-AI policies (and also gotosocial and wafrn)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/pulls/956
There were previous commits from Copilot as early as [November 2025](https://github.com/ruffle-rs/ruffle/pull/22204), however those commits appear to not be included in git history and only Copilot and Claude ones started showing up not long ago in late April
Co-authored-by: vleermuis-admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: overbillduplex615 <overbillduplex615@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/pulls/663
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
community members still welcome, but asked to state that they are not maintainers if they give opinions when being the first to respond to a discussion type issue. Add a note on bigotry we may have missed
this will make it easier to link when we need to, but also visually is nice for a TOC.
Co-authored-by: JesseBot <jessebot@linux.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/854
Reviewed-by: Max <cloudymax@noreply.codeberg.org>
A starting attempt at writing up a template for others to use to contact their favorite projects to ask them to implement a No AI Policy. This is incredibly bare bones right now, but I am 10000% open to feedback and suggestions. Please feel free to open a PR!
The idea is that each section can be added or removed depending on what angle you think the maintainers would be most amenable to.
- closes#116
This PR also cleans up some of the code of conduct and contributing doc.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/192
Co-authored by: @cloudymax
Co-authored by: @Pixelo789
Co-authored-by: jessebot <jessebot@linux.com>
Co-committed-by: jessebot <jessebot@linux.com>
- Tidies "VPN software" section based on style guide and work from #325
- moves "VPN software" and "Virtualization" directly under "Tainted Software"
- clean up TOC
- clean up sibling repo grammar and add ✨ emoji
- adds "AI Databroker Usage" and "AI in Issue tracker" badges
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/364
Co-authored-by: jessebot <jessebot@linux.com>
Co-committed-by: jessebot <jessebot@linux.com>
# Major changes
- adds a specific style guide to point to and iterate on
- closes#139
- markdown tables will now have special tags (using badges) to be used in the evidence column, instead of the aforementioned "severities" concept" - you can read the discussion in this PR as to why we decided against a severity column.
- closes#146
- markdown tables will have a "Last Untainted Version/Commit ID" column
- closes#113
- markdown tables would drop the notes section (in favor of the above columns and below point)
- markdown table now have "alternative" as last column instead of second.
- makes official docs on how to make an alternatives section for a given category
- updaetes python libraries as the first category to get an overhaul to the new style guide
## Minor Changes
- fix some grammar stuff (capitalization, periods, weird wording)
- move GoToSocial into the correct alphabetical order in the bottom alternatives links section
Co-authored-by: @axaloteDev
Co-authored-by: @tjk
Co-authored-by: @PeculiarDemon
Co-authored-by: @cloudymax
Co-authored-by: @micdan5
Co-authored-by: @Pixelo789
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/179
Reviewed-by: Max <cloudymax@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: jessebot <jessebot@linux.com>
Co-committed-by: jessebot <jessebot@linux.com>
This is just so people understand that adding an issue doesn't mean we'll generate a PR for you, only because we are time constrained, but that you're still free to add an Issue and perhaps we or someone else in the community will create a PR for you :)
