Based on available evidence, it appears that version 7.8, pre-dating the recent contributions from Anthropic, is the last untainted version of OpenBSD.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/777
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Webpack piloted Copilot for PRs when it was introduced, so the last untainted tag is the last tag before they started piloting Copilot.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/780
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
* Added their `AGENTS.md` as evidence
* marked `0.95.0` as last untainted
* the `mcp` was added in `0.108.0`
* the first commit of the vibe-coder is `21a54d47a00f09e3710e08ee7624e7b4332dcb27` (<`0.108.0`)
* the first commit co-authored-by a LLM is `21a54d47a00f09e3710e08ee7624e7b4332dcb27` (<`0.108.0`)
* the first code definitively written by a LLM is `3aab69110e5864518f51c97a6453d15551115a64` (<`0.96.0`) (tests generated by copilot)
* with [this](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9145#issuecomment-1544593839) (<`0.96.0`) i am not entirely sure if and to which degree it got added (`Let's run with it and see what happens` might be about the AI-suggestion or about the PR as a whole)
* if anything before that exists it is undisclosed
* since one is uncertain and both are <`0.96.0` i decided to just mark `0.95.0` as last untainted instead of a commit
Co-authored-by: FlemyJY <noreply+not-a-real-email@example.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/748
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
At this point, I believe Bun has crossed the line into "Vibecoded" territory with their vibe-rewrite.
Of course this had to happen during vacation.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/732
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Add link to project
- Remove references to ai functionality: all seem to be issues and proposals, not actual features. The worst thing I could find in this vein was a comment within [3] that suggested maintainers would theoretically accept such features, should their integration be "technically feasible and the goals of SearXNG are not violated" (https://github.com/searxng/searxng/issues/2163#issuecomment-2676107816)
- Add link to permissive LLM policy
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/742
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
This is part two of adding Nerimity as both the server and the client are tainted, but because of the policy only letting one PR per section i had to split it into 2 PR's for both the server and the client. This is for the server side part of it
**For the adding of the client side of the PR, see #724**
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/725
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
This is part one of adding Nerimity as both the server and the client are tainted, but because of the policy only letting one PR per section i had to split it into 2 PR's for both the server and the client. This is for the web client part of it
**For the adding of the server side of the PR, see #725**
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/724
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
The icon always seemed suspicious to me, so I always ignored it based on that. I only decided to look deeper when I found out that [wii.hacks.guide was recommending it](https://wii.hacks.guide/backups).
The repository itself seems fishy (lots of minor commits, emojis in the README), but the only evidence I found was [adding a deepfaked icon](3eef34254c) (the mention of the deepfaked icon was removed in [this commit](aaf6036a5a)), hence the "None?" for the last untainted version.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/692
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
They were mostly based off the readme's "Why not LLM's?" section since the reasons in the first template also were based off that section
Co-Authored by: @Pixelo789
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/708
Reviewed-by: Max <cloudymax@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Relates to #695
This will be removed as soon as we get back from vacation :) Putting it in right now to avoid any confusion, but the repo will remain open and accessible for both PRs and Issues until this evening (CEST).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/721
Alternative Microcontroller Tools and Libraries section was based on #648, with a little bit of modification to generalize it for other microcontroller SDK's in the future if more found
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/686
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
It's been a while since I've used it but I figured I'd check. Luckily we've got yet another alternative as a result, as well as a lot of solid reasons for why they banned such contributions.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/701
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
I managed to sift through the commit history of Hugo, and this commit appears to be the parent of the first commit with known usage of Claude in their repository, meaning it is the last untainted commit. The version I provided is the last version of Hugo which predates that commit.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/699
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
