Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Claude
adfcbb4731
Support sqlite3.connect(autocommit=False) connections too
Database() now accepts all three Python transaction handling modes and
behaves identically in each. For autocommit=False connections - where
the driver holds an implicit transaction open at all times - the
library tracks transaction ownership itself:

- A new _explicit_transaction flag distinguishes transactions opened
  with begin()/atomic() from the driver's implicit one, exposed as a
  new db.in_transaction property (conn.in_transaction is always True
  in this mode)
- begin() claims the driver's implicit transaction instead of
  executing BEGIN, which the driver would reject; BEGIN/COMMIT/
  ROLLBACK passed to db.execute() are routed through begin()/commit()/
  rollback()
- Writes outside a user transaction commit the implicit transaction
  immediately, preserving the library's auto-commit contract
- Row-returning statements outside a transaction fetch eagerly and
  commit, so the implicit read transaction does not hold a shared
  lock that blocks writes from other connections
- PRAGMA and VACUUM run in temporary driver autocommit mode
  (ensure_autocommit_on() now flips conn.autocommit), since PRAGMAs
  are silently ignored and VACUUM refused inside the implicit
  transaction

A new pytest --sqlite-autocommit-false option runs the entire suite
in this mode, wired into CI alongside --sqlite-autocommit. Tests that
asserted on conn.in_transaction or wrote through db.conn without
committing now use the mode-aware library API instead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PFkrS2nuP8mo1jmT594VCd
2026-07-09 22:06:46 +00:00
Simon Willison
a0387791e5 ensure_autocommit_on() raises TransactionError inside a transaction
Assigning conn.isolation_level commits any pending transaction as a side
effect, so entering the context manager with a transaction open silently
committed the caller's work and made a later rollback() a no-op. All
internal callers already ensure no transaction is open; the public API
now enforces it, matching enable_wal() and disable_wal().

Refs https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/769#issuecomment-4900034150

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-06 21:51:31 -07:00
Simon Willison
50938ee6f8
Rename ensure_autocommit_off() to ensure_autocommit_on(), closes #705 2026-07-05 21:54:30 -07:00
Claude
96793668ed
Raise TransactionError instead of RuntimeError from enable_wal/disable_wal
A dedicated sqlite_utils.db.TransactionError exception is clearer
to catch than a generic RuntimeError, and gives future
transaction-state guards a home.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UnLnhsH25Nnv7LHhekUfPd
2026-07-04 22:32:36 +00:00
Claude
ffec11cfb7
enable_wal() and disable_wal() refuse to run inside a transaction
Changing the journal mode assigns conn.isolation_level, which
commits any open transaction as a side effect - silently breaking
the rollback guarantee of atomic() blocks and of user-managed
transactions. Both methods now raise RuntimeError if a transaction
is open. Calling them when the database is already in the requested
mode remains a no-op.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UnLnhsH25Nnv7LHhekUfPd
2026-07-04 18:46:09 +00:00
Simon Willison
90e211e3e2 Now complies with flake8, refs #291 2021-06-22 18:22:08 -07:00
Simon Willison
c449064297 Additional tests for WAL mode
This should have been included in 2d2d724e32

Refs #132
2020-09-07 13:46:12 -07:00