forked from github/pelican
70a690650d
The smallest mark GitHub provides in the bundle is 32x32. Since they explicitly say don't resize the mark, I asked them to provide a 16x16 so we could use it. I received the 16x16 in this commit from GitHub support. However, they suggested we use the 32x32 and use CSS rules to adjust the size: "...we use the 32px for both and employ css background and background- size rules to handle retina displays. I recommend that technique, since retina users will see a mess of pixels for icons that small." This sounds like reasonable advice. Should we consider migrating the notmyidea social icons to 32x32, with appropriate CSS to adjust the sizes? |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| tests | ||
| themes | ||
| tools | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| contents.py | ||
| generators.py | ||
| log.py | ||
| paginator.py | ||
| readers.py | ||
| rstdirectives.py | ||
| server.py | ||
| settings.py | ||
| signals.py | ||
| urlwrappers.py | ||
| utils.py | ||
| writers.py | ||