Well, there are no commits where the AI sloppers _(as I personally refer to AI "assistants")_ are featured so I assume that the entire codebase is tainted with AI-generated code from the very beginning.
> For the smali part I get a huge help from Claude Opus and Claude Sonnet :)
And yeah, since I am creating a new section for frontends I'm not sure if it's properly implemented.
_Edit:_
I don't have Discord, so I can't check that up.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/598
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
For MbedTLS, currently the last untained version is not set because while there are PR's with AI code review bots, none are yet merged so the codebase is untainted (for now)
Also regarding TLS library alternatives, MbedTLS and WolfSSL support embedded and old operating system edge cases while GnuTLS is mostly for the desktop land (Unix/Windows only), but both also work on Unix/Windows as a alternative to those libraries so it's worth noting here
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/597
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
I was unable to find any definitive evidence of AI in previous commits or PRs with simple search terms, however the lead maintainer has been very pro-generative AI in his online presence in the last few years so I can't be certain that any commits prior to the AI-friendly policy are LLM-free
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/593
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Zulip's latest announcement mentions AI tool use, starts out being strict and critical without announcing a full ban, but then sadly deterioriates into praise and announcing increased tool use, to my mind.
I'm not entirely awake and caffeinated, but I think this policy / statement of intent is liberal enough to count as "permissive"? But I'm open to correction!
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/600
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Hello!
I wanted to make a small PR to add `Notepad++ for Mac` to the list of editors. I found out about it from a [MacRumors article](https://www.macrumors.com/2026/04/29/notepad-plus-plus-editor-comes-to-mac/) and tried it out. I was curious and had a look at the GitHub repository. Unfortunately, I discovered that majority of the commits have Claude as a contributor.
I've added the oldest and newest commits that have Claude as a co-contributor as evidence, as well as listed CotEditor as an alternative.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/595
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Added '(md to html)' beside Markdown.pl because cmark can also handle groff man, LaTeX and others which Markdown.pl does not.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/573
Reviewed-by: JesseBot <jessebot@noreply.codeberg.org>
Both allow copilot reviews. Also added some alternatives that are clean (for now):
OpenEBS - block storage
k8s-csi-s3 - S3-backed K8S CSI driver (not as fast as Juicefs but it at least enables the same flows)
Co-authored-by: cloudymax <admin@cloudydev.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/584
Reviewed-by: JesseBot <jessebot@noreply.codeberg.org>
I did search the commit history and diffed releases and came to the
conclusion that the specified 3.3.6-RC1 may have been a typo. As far as
I can see it looks untainted up to 3.8.3-RC1 meaning that the current
LTS line (3.3) is [so far] not affected.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/575
Reviewed-by: JesseBot <jessebot@noreply.codeberg.org>
Originally submitted by @lilygruman in #175, but we waited a while to see if they would reverse course. They did not and instead doubled down. More info on where to politely disagree with AI sponsorship in #554.
Co-authored by: @lilygruman
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/577
Reviewed-by: Max <cloudymax@noreply.codeberg.org>
Was actually going to list it first in the alternatives when adding racket, since it has so much similarity, but then I found this so ye.
Co-authored-by: Isak Andersson <isak@fripost.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/569
Reviewed-by: JesseBot <jessebot@noreply.codeberg.org>
Add watchexec to the list. Includes last untainted commit and version, and two alternatives.
Disclaimer: i am the author of watfs, which i created specifically because watchexec is slopware now.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/563
Reviewed-by: JesseBot <jessebot@noreply.codeberg.org>
It was removed due to #535 because there was no longer any evidence. There is now evidence.
@jessebot / @cloudymax, please merge and lock this as fast as possible, to avoid a repeat of the OpenBSD thread.
To anyone who wants to stir up trouble: ban LLMs, and then we'll talk.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/550
Reviewed-by: JesseBot <jessebot@noreply.codeberg.org>
Longtime followers of the repo will remember #110 and #121 which go into how booklore was largely vibecoded, and how the core maintainer ended up temporarily closing the repo and seemingly permanently shutting down the associated website. Well, it's back and this time they have an official permissive AI policy. This PR removes it as an alternative and adds it as tainted.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/548
- agents and claude.md in the repo
- claude in commits already several months ago
- includes llm and "agentic ai" functionality
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/547
Reviewed-by: JesseBot <jessebot@noreply.codeberg.org>
