(Mostly) detected with `codespell` and `typos` programs, which I wholeheartedly recommend everybody using to check their writings :)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/785
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Remove the VS Code image evidence in favour of a link
- Remove VSCodium as alternative as per #549
- Add Lapce, Gram and Hemlock to the Alternative Editors note, removing the alternatives column
- Correct Lem's tag order as per #638 and !666, and remove the last untainted version (keeping the commit)
- Alphabetize alternative editors and links at the end of the file
- Separate Note Software
- Change category name to "Text And Code Editors"
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/667
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Based on available evidence, it appears that version 7.8, pre-dating the recent contributions from Anthropic, is the last untainted version of OpenBSD.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/777
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Webpack piloted Copilot for PRs when it was introduced, so the last untainted tag is the last tag before they started piloting Copilot.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/780
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
* Added their `AGENTS.md` as evidence
* marked `0.95.0` as last untainted
* the `mcp` was added in `0.108.0`
* the first commit of the vibe-coder is `21a54d47a00f09e3710e08ee7624e7b4332dcb27` (<`0.108.0`)
* the first commit co-authored-by a LLM is `21a54d47a00f09e3710e08ee7624e7b4332dcb27` (<`0.108.0`)
* the first code definitively written by a LLM is `3aab69110e5864518f51c97a6453d15551115a64` (<`0.96.0`) (tests generated by copilot)
* with [this](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9145#issuecomment-1544593839) (<`0.96.0`) i am not entirely sure if and to which degree it got added (`Let's run with it and see what happens` might be about the AI-suggestion or about the PR as a whole)
* if anything before that exists it is undisclosed
* since one is uncertain and both are <`0.96.0` i decided to just mark `0.95.0` as last untainted instead of a commit
Co-authored-by: FlemyJY <noreply+not-a-real-email@example.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/748
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
At this point, I believe Bun has crossed the line into "Vibecoded" territory with their vibe-rewrite.
Of course this had to happen during vacation.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/732
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Add link to project
- Remove references to ai functionality: all seem to be issues and proposals, not actual features. The worst thing I could find in this vein was a comment within [3] that suggested maintainers would theoretically accept such features, should their integration be "technically feasible and the goals of SearXNG are not violated" (https://github.com/searxng/searxng/issues/2163#issuecomment-2676107816)
- Add link to permissive LLM policy
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/742
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
This is part two of adding Nerimity as both the server and the client are tainted, but because of the policy only letting one PR per section i had to split it into 2 PR's for both the server and the client. This is for the server side part of it
**For the adding of the client side of the PR, see #724**
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/725
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
This is part one of adding Nerimity as both the server and the client are tainted, but because of the policy only letting one PR per section i had to split it into 2 PR's for both the server and the client. This is for the web client part of it
**For the adding of the server side of the PR, see #725**
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/724
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
The icon always seemed suspicious to me, so I always ignored it based on that. I only decided to look deeper when I found out that [wii.hacks.guide was recommending it](https://wii.hacks.guide/backups).
The repository itself seems fishy (lots of minor commits, emojis in the README), but the only evidence I found was [adding a deepfaked icon](3eef34254c) (the mention of the deepfaked icon was removed in [this commit](aaf6036a5a)), hence the "None?" for the last untainted version.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/692
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
They were mostly based off the readme's "Why not LLM's?" section since the reasons in the first template also were based off that section
Co-Authored by: @Pixelo789
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/708
Reviewed-by: Max <cloudymax@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Admin <vleermuis-admin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Relates to #695
This will be removed as soon as we get back from vacation :) Putting it in right now to avoid any confusion, but the repo will remain open and accessible for both PRs and Issues until this evening (CEST).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware/pulls/721
